The statement is critical and accusatory in tone, alleging racial bias in the censure of a member of Congress and suggesting a lack of action on issues affecting families of color. It calls for a change in behavior from the accused party.
- The statement may be seen as harmful by those it accuses, but it does not appear to incite violence or use harmful language. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of the person it defends, but it may be seen as not respecting the dignity of those it accuses. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy towards those it accuses, but it does express a desire for better treatment of families of color. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight perceived racial bias, which could be seen as working towards the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses a public platform to address issues of race and representation, which is a responsible use of platform in the context of public discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.