Matt Taibbi

Rank 23 of 47
|
Score 29
1/3/2024, 6:33:12 PM
X
In reply to:
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
765d
3. Similar stories at The Intercept and Guardian ripped State's Global Engagement Center for funding @IranDisinfo, which was said to have dubbed critics of of Trump's "Maximum Pressure" policy “‘mouthpieces,’ ‘apologists,’ ‘collaborators,’ and ‘lobbyists’” of Iran:
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
765d
2. In late May and early June, 2019, a story hit the news: Donald Trump's State Department had been caught trolling people, including a Washington Post reporter, deemed insufficiently tough on Iran. Outrage was universal:
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
765d
1. FOIA FILES EXTRA:
STATE DEPARTMENT "TARGETING AMERICANS"?

The statement is part of a critical discourse on the actions of the State Department regarding the use of public funds and the potential impact on public opinion. It raises concerns about the legality and propriety of government actions, suggesting a violation of traditional bans on propagandizing Americans. The tone is investigative and implies a call for accountability and transparency.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by misuse of public funds for propaganda, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the actions of a government department rather than individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement promotes understanding by shedding light on a potentially significant issue affecting public discourse. [+1]
  4. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the legality of the actions and suggesting a need for scrutiny. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement acknowledges a problem and implies a need for correction, aligning with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses its platform to discuss matters of public interest responsibly, adhering to the principle of using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]