Matt Taibbi

The statement presents a critical view of the Global Engagement Center's (GEC) actions and methodology, suggesting that the GEC continued to target Russia and China and that their methods were questionable. The tone is critical and implies skepticism about the GEC's practices. The images included are screenshots of conversations and highlighted text from articles that provide context and support the statement's critical perspective.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement is critical but does not appear to cause harm; it is part of a discussion on public policy. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity by not targeting individuals but rather discussing the actions of a government entity. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement aims to promote understanding of the GEC's actions, though it does so through a critical lens. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by highlighting perceived issues with the GEC's methodology. [+1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement does not acknowledge mistakes as it is presenting a viewpoint rather than correcting one.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its influence to question and potentially improve government practices by bringing them to light. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech by fostering a discussion on a matter of public interest responsibly. [+1]