Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement is critical and sarcastic, targeting an individual's alleged actions. It uses a negative comparison to express disappointment in the quality of the plagiarism attributed to the individual, and it references the reputation of an institution in a satirical manner.
- The statement uses harsh language that could be harmful to the individual's reputation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement directly targets an individual, potentially violating their privacy and dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and compassion, instead using sarcasm to criticize. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not promote constructive criticism or dialogue but rather uses sarcasm to demean. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.