Reposted by Ilhan Omar
The statement is a critical commentary on the International Court of Justice (ICJ) hearing regarding a massacre. It expresses strong disapproval of the UK and US government's lack of response to the situation. The tone is condemnatory and the intent is to call out perceived inaction and complicity in the face of atrocities.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful to the reputation of the UK & US governments, but it is focused on their actions (or lack thereof) rather than personal attributes. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not violate the privacy or dignity of individuals, as it addresses governments.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not directly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does express a desire for the end of a massacre, which could be seen as a call for compassion on a broader scale.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of governments but does not engage in constructive dialogue or avoid personal attacks, as it labels the silence as 'cowardice' and 'complicity'. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to highlight a serious issue and prompt action, which aligns with the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by using the platform to address a matter of public concern responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.