The statement is critical of the GOP's stance on IRS funding, implying that defunding would benefit the wealthy at the expense of public services. It presents a recent IRS collection as evidence against defunding.
- The statement does not appear to do harm but uses charged language that could be seen as divisive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not violate the privacy or dignity of others, nor does it engage in harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding of the consequences of defunding the IRS but lacks empathy towards those with opposing views. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but borders on a personal attack by suggesting ulterior motives without evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence for societal betterment by advocating for funding public services. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but could be more responsible in its accusations. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.