The statement 'I said what I said' in reference to Rashida Tlaib's comment on the House floor about Netanyahu being a 'genocidal maniac' is a reaffirmation of a strong and controversial opinion expressed in a public and political context. The content is a direct criticism of a public figure's actions or policies, which constitutes public discourse.
- The statement does harm with words by using inflammatory language that could incite hostility. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement disrespects the dignity of the individual by using a term that is harsh and could be considered a form of verbal harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses extreme language that polarizes rather than bridges understanding. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a personal attack rather than focusing on specific policies or actions. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society as it does not contribute to a constructive or respectful discourse. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly; it uses the platform to make an extreme accusation without a basis for constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.