Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement appears to be a commentary on the state of reporting regarding a border crisis, suggesting that political motivations are a barrier to resolving the issue. The tone seems to be critical but not inflammatory, and the intent is to highlight a perceived issue in political priorities.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but rather to critique a situation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not directly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not negate them either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue on the issue, although it does not directly engage with opposing views. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to highlight an issue of national concern, which could be seen as aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to share a perspective responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.