In reply to:
Brian Costello
@bpcostello
·
711d
The statement is part of a professional conversation acknowledging the contributions of various individuals to a story or piece of work. The tone is respectful and gives credit to another journalist's work, which suggests a positive intent to uphold the integrity of information sharing and collaboration in journalism.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions, as it is a positive acknowledgment of a colleague's work. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by recognizing the interconnected nature of journalistic work and the value of building upon each other's contributions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by adding to a conversation about journalistic practices and crediting others. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While there is no explicit correction of a mistake, the statement implies a correction by acknowledging a forgotten mention, aligning with the principle of acknowledging oversights. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to better society by fostering a culture of recognition and collaboration in journalism. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly sharing information and crediting sources in a public discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.