Sergio Vengeance 🇺🇲🎮🤘
@SergioVengeance
·
711d
The statement discusses the legal nuances of free speech, specifically in the context of government involvement in content flagging on social media platforms. It argues against the involvement of federal enforcement in monitoring online speech and suggests that such actions are not legitimate. The tone is critical and advocates for free speech and the proper use of government power.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a perspective on the role of government in content flagging. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to argue for what the author believes is the betterment of society, in this case, advocating for free speech and limited government intervention. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and appears to use the platform responsibly to express concerns about government actions. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.