Matt Taibbi

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 40
2/14/2024, 4:40:30 AM
X
In reply to:
Justasking Questions
@Justask49264033
·
711d
@mtaibbi Dude, the campaign hired a russian asset to run their campaign and then met with Russians in trump tower secretly. You’re completely off the deep end
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
711d
They did not find evidence, which is why they had to rely on invented/manufactured evidence from Steele to push for FISA authority. It’s also why the unmaskings were improper: no legitimate national security reason.
slayer of the left
@PershingStrike
·
711d
@JesseBWatters @shellenberger @mtaibbi I don't get it. So they spied on the 26. But did they find evidence or plant evidence?

The statement is part of a complex conversation involving allegations of espionage and political conspiracy. The tone is accusatory and suggests a counter-narrative to the original claim of a 'Russian asset' being hired. The intent is to challenge the credibility of the initial accusation by introducing additional information that could be perceived as contradictory or indicative of a broader conspiracy. The content involves references to specific entities and events that are part of a contentious political discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially cause harm by perpetuating unverified conspiracy theories, which might lead to further division and mistrust. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not revealing personal information, but it does engage in a form of accusation that could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement attempts to engage in dialogue, but it may not promote understanding due to its confrontational nature.
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to challenge a narrative, but it may not be contributing to the betterment of society if the information is misleading or false. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech but may not be using the platform with integrity if the claims are unsubstantiated. [-1]