Matt Taibbi

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 40
2/14/2024, 4:43:56 AM
X
In reply to:
Justasking Questions
@Justask49264033
·
711d
@mtaibbi Dude, the campaign hired a russian asset to run their campaign and then met with Russians in trump tower secretly. You’re completely off the deep end
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
711d
They did not find evidence, which is why they had to rely on invented/manufactured evidence from Steele to push for FISA authority. It’s also why the unmaskings were improper: no legitimate national security reason.
slayer of the left
@PershingStrike
·
711d
@JesseBWatters @shellenberger @mtaibbi I don't get it. So they spied on the 26. But did they find evidence or plant evidence?

The statement is part of a political discussion involving allegations of misconduct. It references a payment for a speech and a meeting with a foreign leader, implying a double standard in the evaluation of interactions with foreign entities. The tone is critical and suggests wrongdoing or hypocrisy without providing full context or evidence. The image accompanying the statement shows a person speaking at an event, which seems to be related to the content of the message.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as harmful by implying wrongdoing without context, potentially damaging reputations. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy by not revealing personal information, but it could be seen as not fully respecting the dignity of the individuals involved by suggesting misconduct without complete evidence. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is accusatory and lacks context. [-1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to critique, but it may not be for the betterment of society if it spreads information without full context or understanding. [-1]