Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement appears to be a clarification of the speaker's political stance and the reasons behind their concern about a candidate's age. The tone is explanatory rather than aggressive or harmful. The intent seems to be to address assumptions about the speaker's political motives and to engage in a dialogue about a relevant issue in the public discourse.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but rather to clarify the speaker's position and reasoning. It does not contain harmful language or intent. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The speaker invites dialogue by explaining their stance and opening up about their reasons, which could lead to constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.