Spring because after WINTER comes 🦁hear me ROAR
@summer7570
·
695d
The statement in question appears to be part of a political discussion involving opinions on border security and media bias. The tone is confrontational and critical, particularly towards a political figure and certain media outlets. The statement asserts a position on border policy and expresses distrust in specific news sources, while endorsing another. The images and links provided seem to be related to the context of the conversation, offering background information on border security and historical context on immigration policy.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm, but the confrontational tone could be perceived as aggressive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and does not appear to engage in harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and compassion in its confrontational tone. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but may not promote constructive dialogue due to its tone. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication of acknowledgment or correction of mistakes.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to express a viewpoint, but it may not contribute to the betterment of society if it polarizes rather than informs. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but may not use the platform with complete integrity due to potential bias in the sources endorsed. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.