TC Massachusetts
@MassachusettsTc
·
688d
The statement criticizes the behavior of engaging in selective outrage and hypocrisy, suggesting a preference for critical thinking over groupthink. It appears to be a part of a larger conversation about media, critical thinking, and the exchange of ideas. The tone is critical and confrontational, and it addresses the issue of intellectual integrity in public discourse.
- The statement is critical but does not seem to intend harm. It aims to point out what the speaker sees as a flaw in discourse. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks a tone of empathy and compassion, focusing instead on criticizing the behavior of others. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not appear to foster constructive dialogue, as it uses accusatory language like 'whataboutism' and 'yeah but' bs. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.