In reply to:
janey v. 🤌
@nycjaneyvee
·
561d
The statement in question is part of a conversation that touches upon the sensitive and complex issue of children's consent in the context of puberty and medical interventions such as puberty blockers. The tone of the conversation appears to be confrontational and accusatory, particularly with the use of terms like 'rightwing nutjob' and 'grifting off rightwing nutjobs because they are low IQ and easy to dupe.' The intent seems to be to challenge and criticize the views of the other party in the conversation.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm with words and actions, as it includes derogatory language and personal attacks. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others and engages in language that could be considered harassment or hate speech. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but rather seems to incite division and hostility. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.