Matt Taibbi

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -16
3/12/2024, 2:39:59 AM
X
In reply to:
Zote The Mighty's #1 Fanboy
@ArmchairBrain
·
560d
@mtaibbi @MartinKulldorff Perhaps it was because @MartinKulldorff was pushing eugenics and minimizing COVID, Matt.

Seriously, what happened to you, @mtaibbi ?
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
560d
This is outrageous. We knew @MartinKulldorff was improperly deamplified on Twitter via Stanford’s Virality Project, but we didn’t know the cowardice Harvard showed in suppressing him. How is this defensible?
Martin Kulldorff
@MartinKulldorff
·
561d
I am no longer a professor of medicine at @Harvard. Here is the story of my Harvard experience until I was fired for clinging to the truth.
https://www.city-journal.org/art…

The statement is accusatory and confrontational, questioning the intent and actions of @MartinKulldorff in relation to the topic of eugenics and COVID-19. The tone is skeptical and demands clarification on a serious accusation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially cause harm by accusing someone of promoting eugenics without clear evidence, which is a serious allegation. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity to the extent that it does not reveal private information, but it does engage in a form of harassment by making a grave accusation publicly. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it escalates the conflict by introducing the concept of eugenics into the discussion. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes an accusation without providing context or evidence, which could be seen as a personal attack rather than a substantive argument. [-2]