The statement is an example of public discourse as it addresses a societal issue of providing free school meals to children, which is a policy matter. The tone is assertive and proactive, with the intent to advocate for a federal bill that aligns with the policy implemented in Minnesota.
- The statement aims to do no harm and instead promotes a policy that could benefit children. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by advocating for a policy that could help all children, regardless of their background. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and compassion by highlighting a policy that addresses child hunger and nutrition. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather focuses on the policy issue at hand. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to advocate for the betterment of society by promoting a policy aimed at helping children. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly using the platform to advocate for a policy change. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.