Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement reports on a specific incident involving the President and a claim made by a special counsel, Robert Hur, regarding the President's memory of a personal event. The content is factual, referencing an interview transcript and providing a link for further reading. The tone appears to be neutral, simply relaying information without evident bias.
- The statement does no harm as it reports facts without malicious intent. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not revealing personal information beyond what is relevant to the public discourse. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement itself does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does provide information that could lead to a better understanding of the situation.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by fact-checking a claim made about the President without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to inform the public about a matter of public interest, contributing to a better-informed society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly sharing information from a credible source. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.