Gary Marcus

The statement '@BasedBeffJezos Ad hominem, without actually considering the points I made, hence on brand.' is a criticism of the previous user's argument style, suggesting that it is an attack on the person rather than the argument. The tone is confrontational and implies that the previous user's response is typical ('on brand') for them, suggesting a pattern of behavior. The image included shows two individuals at a conference, which seems to be related to the broader conversation about AI, but does not directly impact the analysis of the statement.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement points out a perceived ad hominem attack, which could be seen as an attempt to discourage harmful argument tactics and promote more constructive dialogue. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks, but it does imply a negative pattern of behavior for the other user, which could be seen as slightly disrespectful.
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement encourages a focus on the argument rather than the person, which aligns with promoting understanding and constructive criticism. [+1]