Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 79
3/15/2024, 1:10:04 PM
X
In reply to:
Alignment Lab AI
@alignment_lab
·
581d
@GaryMarcus @ednewtonrex well, assuming overfitting isnt the intention, youll have a hard time ever getting exactly those examples out of a model
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
581d
@alignment_lab @ednewtonrex and then drawing exactly those examples with no extra value? like tracing, almost.
Alignment Lab AI
@alignment_lab
·
581d
@GaryMarcus @ednewtonrex learning how to draw from examples
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
581d
Best analogy for using “publicly available” data that is actually copyrighted, without compensation or consent?

Stealing hubcaps (h/t @ednewtonrex)
Recording a meeting without consent
Kidnapping a child from playground
Other (please specify below)

The statement appears to be part of a technical discussion on Twitter regarding the use of copyrighted data in machine learning models. The tone is conversational and informative, as it provides visual examples from an article to contribute to the conversation about model training and output. The intent seems to be to clarify a point or provide evidence in the context of a debate on the ethics and mechanics of machine learning. The content includes a comparison of original movie scenes with those generated by a machine learning model, which is relevant to the discussion about the use of copyrighted material.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm as it contributes to an academic or technical discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity by not including any personal information or engaging in any form of harassment. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by providing visual examples to clarify a point in the discussion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by adding to the dialogue with relevant examples. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to contribute to a technical debate, which could be seen as bettering society by fostering informed discussion. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by sharing information in a responsible manner, without any apparent intent to mislead or harm. [+1]