Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 89
3/15/2024, 4:29:45 PM
X
In reply to:
ArbitraryOstrich 🇨🇦P(Doom)5yr=~8%
@ArbitraryOstric
·
576d
@GaryMarcus @alignment_lab @ednewtonrex @Rahll My dude, if that's the prompt, then you asked for it to trace stuff, and it mostly fails?

Littlerally, the "be a scary robot" meme.

You asked a kid who's learning to draw to recreate something specific, it tries, and you go aha! See.

Like you gave attribution in the asking
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
576d
@alignment_lab @ednewtonrex Nope…. where have you been?
Examples from my article with @Rahll
Alignment Lab AI
@alignment_lab
·
576d
@GaryMarcus @ednewtonrex well, assuming overfitting isnt the intention, youll have a hard time ever getting exactly those examples out of a model
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
576d
@alignment_lab @ednewtonrex and then drawing exactly those examples with no extra value? like tracing, almost.
Alignment Lab AI
@alignment_lab
·
576d
@GaryMarcus @ednewtonrex learning how to draw from examples
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
576d
Best analogy for using “publicly available” data that is actually copyrighted, without compensation or consent?

Stealing hubcaps (h/t @ednewtonrex)
Recording a meeting without consent
Kidnapping a child from playground
Other (please specify below)

The statement appears to be part of a technical discussion about the capabilities and ethical implications of AI models that generate images based on prompts. The use of the term 'fool' could be interpreted as disrespectful, but in the context of a heated debate, it might be seen as a lighthearted jab rather than a serious insult. The statement includes an image that is a collage of characters from the Star Wars franchise, which is relevant to the discussion about AI-generated content and copyright issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The use of 'fool' is mildly disrespectful, which could be harmful in a sensitive context, but here it seems to be part of a casual exchange. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not appear to violate the privacy or dignity of any individuals.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement contributes to the dialogue about AI and copyright, although the tone could be more constructive.
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement aims to correct or challenge a point in the discussion, which is a form of using influence to address issues in the field. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement engages in the debate responsibly, despite the informal tone.