Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 89
3/15/2024, 4:46:30 PM
X
In reply to:
Dr Patrick M. - AI Builder
@patmcguinness
·
575d
@GaryMarcus (a) is imho falsely premised. LLMs have no more GIGO factor than search engines that surface a flat earth blog.
(b) while tenable, LLMs are not nearly as capable of 'fake news' spreading as we humans armed with social media.
No wonder E/Acc 'won'. Let's set premises better.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
575d
Conditions under which you would ban LLMs
a. If they completely polluted the information ecosphere and undermined science
b. If they completely polluted the information ecosphere and undermined democracy
c. Other (specify)
d. None, I am e/acc. Damn the consequences.

The statement is a critical response to a conversation about the potential negative impacts of language learning models (LLMs). The tone is dismissive and condescending, suggesting that the other party lacks understanding and should seek education on the topic.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement is dismissive and could be seen as harmful in its condescension, violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and does not promote understanding, violating the principle of using words to foster empathy and compassion. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    While the statement engages in criticism, it is not constructive and does not encourage dialogue, violating the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [-1]