Matt Taibbi

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -19

The statement is part of a public discourse on social media regulation and government power. It is dismissive and critical in tone, challenging the validity of a comparison in the discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses disrespectful language which could be seen as harmful. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement includes a personal attack rather than constructive criticism. [-1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no acknowledgment or correction of mistakes.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not demonstrate an effort to better society.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement contributes to the discourse but may not uphold responsible and integrity-filled discourse. [-1]