Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement expresses concern about the potential negative impact of language model-generated content on scientific literature. The tone is cautionary and somewhat alarmist, indicating a strong opinion that if the issue of inaccurate content is not addressed, it could lead to significant harm to the scientific community. The image contains text that criticizes the quality of content generated by AI, using strong language to emphasize the perceived decline in scientific integrity.
- The statement calls for action to prevent harm to the scientific community, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of the scientific community by advocating for the integrity of scientific literature. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the potential issues with AI-generated content in science, but the language used could be seen as less conducive to empathetic dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about a potential problem, aiming for the betterment of society by maintaining the quality of scientific discourse. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.