The statement appears to be a critical question aimed at holding someone accountable for their advocacy, suggesting that it could have negative consequences on the progress of science. The tone seems to be serious and possibly confrontational, depending on the context.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but rather to provoke thought and accountability. It does not contain harmful language.Β [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement invites a dialogue or response from the person it addresses, although it could be perceived as confrontational rather than constructive without further context.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.