Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 89

The statement is part of a conversation that critiques a claim made about AI and diversity, focusing on the logical fallacies in the argument. The tone is critical but not disrespectful, and the intent is to correct misinformation and engage in a constructive dialogue about the topic.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to correct misinformation without causing harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by pointing out logical fallacies. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is an example of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]
  4. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    While the statement itself does not acknowledge a personal mistake, it encourages others to correct misinformation. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to promote a more informed discussion on AI, which could benefit society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by responsibly engaging in a public discourse. [+1]