In reply to:
Geoffrey Miller
@primalpoly
·
570d
The statement is part of a conversation about differing views on AI development. The tone is somewhat frustrated but aims to clarify the speaker's position on AI and counteract misrepresentation of their views.
- The statement does not intend to harm but to clarify the speaker's position on AI development. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The speaker attempts to promote understanding by clarifying their stance on AI. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue with those who disagree, although it does so by summarizing the opposition's argument rather than directly engaging with it. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.