Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement is part of a conversation about differing views on AI development. The tone is somewhat frustrated but aims to clarify the speaker's position on AI and counteract misrepresentations of their stance. The content is a defense of their viewpoint and a critique of those who misinterpret it.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but expresses frustration with misrepresentation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding of the speaker's actual views on AI. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue with those in disagreement, although it does so by summarizing the opposition's argument rather than directly engaging with it. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.