Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement appears to be a critical commentary on the AI industry's practices regarding compensation for creators and the potential impact on society. It raises concerns about fairness and the industry's commitment to societal welfare.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but rather to highlight a perceived injustice. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement invites dialogue on the issue, although it could be seen as confrontational rather than inviting constructive criticism.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to prompt a discussion on societal betterment, specifically in the context of fair compensation and support for those affected by AI. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.