Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 89
3/16/2024, 2:48:36 PM
X
In reply to:
Tom
@TomTomClub510
·
570d
@AntsInYourMouth @neilturkewitz @GaryMarcus People are looking to monetize works that are not theirs. Either share the profits or create your own work. The music industry figured it out. It can be done. https://twitter.com/TomTomClub51…
ZKTruth.eth
@AntsInYourMouth
·
570d
@TomTomClub510 @neilturkewitz @GaryMarcus Absolutely not. I'm talking about neither creating forgeries nor passing them off as originals. That's a huge leap to make. Nobody is passing off their midjourney results as a long lost van gogh work. Come on now.
Tom
@TomTomClub510
·
570d
@AntsInYourMouth @neilturkewitz @GaryMarcus You are talking about creating forgeries and passing them off as originals. Thats called counterfeiting and it is illegal as well as unethical.
ZKTruth.eth
@AntsInYourMouth
·
570d
@neilturkewitz @TomTomClub510 @GaryMarcus AI is as capable of studying as it is of stealing beach towels. No need to confuse fantasy with analogy. You and AI both are black boxes that can take a bunch of images as inputs and can then produce a similar but different image as an output. But I guess you have "inspiration"
neil turkewitz
@neilturkewitz
·
570d
@TomTomClub510 @AntsInYourMouth @GaryMarcus Indeed. ZK took a hard right turn into fantasy when he referred to AI as “studying.” AI is incapable of studying. It copies and reassembles the elements that it has copied. It doesn’t learn. It doesn’t study. And it’s certainly not getting inspired to create. https://twitter.com/neilturkewit…
Tom
@TomTomClub510
·
570d
@AntsInYourMouth @neilturkewitz @GaryMarcus It’s “We will drink your milkshake” any way you spin it, ZK

The statement is part of a conversation about the ethics of AI in relation to creativity and ownership in the music industry. The tone is serious and engages in a debate about the nature of AI and its comparison to human creativity. The intent is to clarify a position on AI's capabilities and the legal and ethical implications of its use in creating works that may resemble those of others. The content addresses the concerns of monetization and originality in creative works produced by AI.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not seem to intend harm but is part of a critical discussion on AI and creativity. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding of the speaker's viewpoint on AI and creativity, though it may lack empathy towards opposing views.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is part of a constructive dialogue, despite a disagreement on the nature of AI and its comparison to human creativity. [+1]