Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 89
3/16/2024, 11:49:48 PM
X
In reply to:
Anthony Aguirre
@AnthonyNAguirre
·
573d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk IMO, whether this bet is interesting or even makes sense entirely depends on the terms. If the requirement is that the AI be superhuman in at every intellectual task (what https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.02462… would call "superintelligence") that seems both extremely unlikely and a much higher…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
573d
Sneak preview: The proposed bet to @ElonMusk re AI versus humans at the end of 2025 will be for $𝟏𝟎 𝐌𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧, supported in part by a backer who has come forward.

Details forthcoming.

If you want in (on the side of humans still exceeding AI then in some aspects of…

The statement is part of a conversation about AI and human intelligence, specifically addressing a point made by another user in the context of a proposed bet. The tone is conversational and seeks to clarify a point about AI's capabilities in chess, which is a factual topic rather than a personal one.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a factual discussion which can lead to better understanding of the topic.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by clarifying a point in the ongoing dialogue about AI. [+1]