In reply to:
Jim Babcock
@jimrandomh
·
573d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
573d
The statement is part of a technical discussion regarding the performance of an AI model in generating sentences with a specific constraint. The tone is critical but constructive, aiming to point out that there are both errors and successes in the AI's output that cannot be fully explained by the tokenizer's limitations. The intent is to contribute to the conversation by highlighting the need for a more nuanced understanding of the AI's performance.
- The statement does not cause harm and is focused on the technical aspects of the AI's performance. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by suggesting that the issue is more complex than initially presented. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by acknowledging both the errors and successes of the AI model. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.