Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 89
3/17/2024, 4:58:28 PM
X
In reply to:
Florian Georg
@florian_georg
·
574d
@GaryMarcus So all this fuzz us just some pretty standard academic disagreement on how good/useful/limited a particular rival approach is? Cool, cool.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
574d
For the avoidance of doubt, I am *not* negative about AI. I want AI to succeed.

I am negative about LLMs. We need a better approach, one that is reliable, safe, fair, and trustworthy.

LLMs will never be that, so it’s time to move on.

I stand by what I wrote here four years…
Mbongeni Ndlovu
@Mbounge_
·
574d
@GaryMarcus Gary was so negative about AI - I'm sure the tech will improve down the line - this is only the beginning - give it time to mature

The statement '@florian_georg no; the very fabric of society is at stake' is a part of a public discourse on the societal implications of AI and LLMs. It expresses a concern for the potential risks AI may pose to society.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises a concern without causing harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It implies a concern for societal well-being but lacks detail.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement contributes to dialogue but is not constructive in offering solutions. [-1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    It shows an intent to use influence for societal good. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech. [+1]