The statement is critical of attempts to discredit the information revealed in the #TwitterFiles and emphasizes the legal scrutiny of such content control efforts. It also attempts to redirect the focus from an individual's statements to the broader issue of state-sponsored content control.
- The statement aims to highlight concerns about state-sponsored content control without causing harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the issue rather than personal attributes. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It promotes understanding of the legal and societal implications of content control. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the attempt to discredit the information presented. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement acknowledges the legal perspective on the issue, suggesting a correction of misinformation. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- It uses the platform to discuss the implications of content control for society responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.