Reposted by Matt Taibbi
Toby Rogers, Ph.D., M.P.P.
@uTobian
·
549d
The statement criticizes a New York Times article, suggesting it is propaganda and expressing discontent with its portrayal of free speech issues. The statement also references a Supreme Court case related to free speech, indicating the conversation is about public issues.
- The statement uses harsh language but does not seem to intend harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not violate privacy or dignity, nor does it engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but includes a profane dismissal of the NY Times, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement expresses a desire to protect free speech, which could be seen as aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but may not use the platform responsibly due to the use of profanity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.