The statement is part of a conversation about the ethical and legal considerations of generative AI companies using people's work without permission. It suggests that the funds used for lobbying could be better spent on licensing the work they use. This touches on societal issues of intellectual property rights and the responsibilities of AI companies, making it public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by advocating for the licensing of work rather than using it without permission. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting an alternative use of funds that respects creators' rights. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI companies' current practices without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement suggests using influence for the betterment of society by respecting intellectual property rights. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech responsibly by contributing to the dialogue on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.