Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement questions the value of investing a significant amount of money into the development of AI technology if the progress stalls at a certain point. It reflects on the potential disappointment or the implications of reaching a plateau in AI advancements despite substantial investments.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it is a hypothetical question about investment and technological progress. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others as it does not target any individual or group. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by encouraging reflection on the value of investment in AI technology. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is part of a constructive dialogue about the expectations and potential outcomes of AI development. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement acknowledges the possibility of limitations in AI progress, which is an important aspect of a realistic and balanced discussion. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to engage in a responsible discussion about the future of AI technology. [+1]