Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement is part of a conversation about the current state and future of AI technology, which is a topic of public interest and debate. The tone is critical and dismissive of current AI efforts, and the intent seems to be to express agreement with Gary Marcus's criticisms of AI and to add further criticism of the field.
- The statement uses harsh language ('suck') which could be seen as harmful or offensive to those working in the AI field. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not appear to violate the privacy or dignity of others, nor does it engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It dismisses the entire field of AI without acknowledging any positive aspects or efforts. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses absolute terms ('100% of the time', 'essentially sucks') and does not invite discussion or debate. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society. It contributes to a negative discourse surrounding AI without offering constructive solutions or improvements. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.