Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement is part of a public discourse on the monetization of generative AI, advertising, and artist compensation. It raises concerns about the use of AI for retroactive product placement in videos, which is a relevant issue in the context of digital media and intellectual property rights.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm as it is a speculative observation about the use of AI in advertising. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others as it does not target any individuals or groups. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement is neutral and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement contributes to understanding the potential uses of AI in advertising, which could foster empathy and compassion for those affected by such practices. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement corrects a misconception by providing an example of how AI is already being used in ways that could affect artists and consumers. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to discuss a societal issue responsibly and with integrity, without spreading misinformation. [+1]