The statement is a direct journalistic inquiry into a public figure's past statements on vaccine safety and efficacy, aiming to clarify and correct public information.
- The journalist's approach is direct but not harmful; it seeks to clarify facts. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The question is about public statements made by the figure, so it respects privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to correct potential misinformation, which indirectly promotes understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The journalist is engaging in constructive criticism by fact-checking. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement seeks to address potential mistakes in public claims. [+2]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- By addressing vaccine misinformation, the statement aims to better society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The journalist is using her platform to responsibly address public health concerns. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.