Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement is part of a conversation about the accountability of predictions made by AI leaders regarding the timeline for AI to surpass human intelligence. It suggests implementing a 'test of time' analysis to hold those making predictions accountable and to mitigate hyperbolic statements. The tone is critical but constructive, and the intent is to promote responsible discourse in the field of AI.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not intend to harm but to promote accountability. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement encourages understanding and responsible communication in the field of AI. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement aims to use influence to improve the quality of discourse in society. [+1]