The statement is a response to a conversation about seeking medical advice, which can be considered a public issue. The tone seems dismissive and potentially aggressive with the use of profanity. The intent appears to be to caution against relying on unverified sources for medical information, which is a valid concern. However, the content lacks constructiveness and could be seen as dismissive towards the capabilities of Language Learning Models (LLMs) in providing medical information.
- The use of profanity could be seen as harmful or aggressive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not appear to violate the principle of respecting privacy and dignity, nor does it engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement could be seen as a personal attack on the credibility of LLMs and does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.