Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
3/21/2024, 4:59:23 PM
X
In reply to:
Ian Osband
@IanOsband
·
663d
@GaryMarcus We need a new "geometric intelligence" Gary!

Looking forward to when you blow these LLMs out the water 🙏
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
663d
OpenAI employee goes after me because his $86B-valued company has already found a a bunch of modest use established cases. 🤔

Note that
- I never said that there zero use cases (often pointing to coding as best use case)
- Sorting out drivers etc is not an $86B problem
- My…
Ian Osband
@IanOsband
·
663d
A lot of the value from ChatGPT comes in mundane/mindless drudgery, not deep thinking.

People like @GaryMarcus overlook the genuine value here:
- installing nvidia drivers
- sorting out messed up ruby version
- setting up custom domain name

Many such cases.

The statement '@IanOsband I responded to this before. You are childish.' is a personal attack and does not contribute to a constructive public discourse. It is a direct response to a previous conversation about the value of AI and 'geometric intelligence', but the statement itself does not address the public issue substantively and instead resorts to name-calling.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does harm by using derogatory language ('childish'). [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the individual it addresses. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a personal attack rather than constructive criticism or dialogue. [-2]