Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement discusses the John Edwards scandal and compares the potential reaction of Trump's base to a hypothetical similar situation. It implies a commentary on the changing standards of political accountability and public reaction to personal misconduct by politicians.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm but does discuss sensitive personal matters of public figures.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others to the extent that it discusses public figures within the context of widely reported scandals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement could be seen as promoting understanding of political dynamics, though it may lack empathy for the individuals involved.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not appear to engage in constructive dialogue or avoid personal attacks. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes as it is a singular comment.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses its platform to comment on societal issues, but the integrity of the comparison could be questioned given the hypothetical nature of the Trump scenario.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.