Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
3/21/2024, 8:40:54 PM
X
In reply to:
Ian Osband
@IanOsband
·
663d
@DanraeP @Siddharth87 @GaryMarcus People are so obsessed with automating 100% of the process...

If you automate 80% of the process that's basically 80% as good.

Add in the teaching element... Could be more
Danrae Pray
@DanraeP
·
663d
@Siddharth87 @GaryMarcus @IanOsband It's not automating anything of economic value, not even invoicing.

It can't do anything reliably w/o a human expert in the loop, in which case it's mostly wasting the human expert's time.

Also, automated invoicing was solved years ago with software 🤣
Danrae Pray
@DanraeP
·
665d
@GaryMarcus @zacharyaustin11 Having built on top of it personally, I can say there is no one using LLMs to do anything critical to their business, especially triggering financial transactions.

If you're using it for intent classification, you're going to have some really pissed off customers.
Sid Bharath
@Siddharth87
·
663d
@DanraeP @GaryMarcus @IanOsband You’re missing the point re installing Nvidia drivers, that’s the tip of the iceberg.

Go to TikTok, Instagram, Reddit, there’s literally thousands of people automating things or getting more done in hundreds of use cases.

For us in the tech world maybe it’s nothing but the…
Danrae Pray
@DanraeP
·
663d
@GaryMarcus @IanOsband Hi everyone,

I'm starting a company to help the world install nvidia drivers and different ruby versions with a game-changing 92% accuracy rate.

I'm looking for an $86 billion dollar investment.

Anyone want in?

Thanks,
Danrae
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
663d
@IanOsband I responded to this before.

You are childish.
Ian Osband
@IanOsband
·
663d
@GaryMarcus We need a new "geometric intelligence" Gary!

Looking forward to when you blow these LLMs out the water 🙏

The statement is part of a technical discussion on the reliability requirements of different tasks for automation and artificial intelligence. It addresses the varying levels of precision needed for tasks like driving versus ad recommendations. The tone is informative and contributes to a larger conversation about the practical applications and limitations of AI in different domains.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to inform and does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement contributes to understanding by clarifying the different reliability needs for various tasks. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by adding nuance to the conversation about automation reliability without personal attacks. [+1]