Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
3/21/2024, 8:44:38 PM
X
In reply to:
Peter Kuhar
@pkuhar
·
663d
This is an often missed point. The LLM does not return the correct results in the first shot and we judge it harshly. (especially @GaryMarcus http://et.al/)

But in so many cases and LLM will fix it's mistakes if given a chance or be allowed to use some tools.
Andrew Ng
@AndrewYNg
·
663d
I think AI agentic workflows will drive massive AI progress this year — perhaps even more than the next generation of foundation models. This is an important trend, and I urge everyone who works in AI to pay attention to it.

Today, we mostly use LLMs in zero-shot mode, prompting…

The statement is a neutral, factual contribution to a discussion on AI performance, seeking to add to the conversation by referencing potential sources of data or analysis.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement contributes to constructive dialogue. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement indirectly contributes to societal benefit through technical discussion. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement supports free speech by contributing to an open discussion. [+1]