Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47

Score 83

@IntuitMachine I know every individual word in your post but have no idea what you are saying or how it relates to what I said, nor how it addressed the core problem that I have long pointed to.

3/22/2024, 2:17:30 PM

In reply to:

Carlos E. Perez

@IntuitMachine

661d

@GaryMarcus It's seems to me that you've got the order of inference backwards. It's actually not deduction->induction->abduction. It's the opposite direction (see: C.S. Peirce), and therefore, there's a flaw in your conceptualization of general cognition.

The statement is a part of a public discourse on the conceptualization of general cognition. It is critical but not harmful, and it engages in a debate without personal attacks.

Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects privacy and dignity. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement is neutral in promoting understanding, empathy, or compassion.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses influence for the betterment of society by promoting intellectual discourse. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds the principles of free speech responsibly. [+1]