The statement is a positive feedback to a discussion about A.I. that involves a public figure (Gary Marcus) and a media outlet (WIRED). It addresses the quality of the explanation given by the expert on a substantive topic of public interest (artificial intelligence). The tone is complimentary, the intent is to express approval, and the content refers to a specific discussion on A.I. questions and answers.
- The statement does no harm and is positive in nature. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging a clear and level-headed explanation on a complex topic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages constructively without any personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.