In reply to:
The statement is a response to a conversation about the potential end of a pandemic-era subsidy for internet connectivity, which is a public issue. The statement draws a parallel to the enhanced child tax credit, noting its effectiveness and bipartisan benefit, but also its end due to political issues. The tone is informative and slightly critical of political dysfunction.
- The statement does no harm and is focused on policy impact. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, with no indication of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the bipartisan benefits of a policy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of political dysfunction without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight important social welfare issues. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly contributing to public discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.